• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
My Money Design

My Money Design

Designing Financial Freedom

  • Start Here
    • Start a Blog
    • What Is Passive Income?
    • Passive Income Ideas
    • My eBooks
  • Categories
    • Retirement
    • Savings & Budgeting
    • Stocks & Investing
    • Philosophy & Motivation
    • Travel Rewards
    • Money Books
    • Mortgage & Refinance
    • Insurance & Estate Planning
    • Credit
    • Taxes
    • Career
    • Blogging
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy

Is Sprint Total Equipment Protection Worth the Cost? The Numbers May Surprise You!

June 21, 2016 by MMD 14 Comments
Some of the links included in this article are from our advertisers. Please read our Disclosure for more info.



Every cell phone dealer tries to sell you on the idea that you NEED to have insurance on your device. But at the rates they're charging, does this make sense? Let's take a closer look at the Sprint Total Equipment Protection plan and really see if its worth it. Read more at MyMoneyDesign.comWhen it comes to your cell phone, do you have some type of insurance or equipment protection plan?

If you do, you’re definitely not alone! With as much as phones get dropped, wet, cracked, sat on, or just plain lost, you almost can’t afford NOT to have some type of coverage. There’s nothing more annoying than having a phone that’s not working 100%. And with as much as they’re charging currently for an iPhone, at first glance, it seems almost crazy not to have some sort of protection for your device.

The first time we got my wife her iPhone, we added a coverage plan to her account, and I believe at the time it was only an extra $7 per month.  With a deal like that, how could you pass it up?

Lately, however, things are different; a lot different. With my kids getting bigger and more cell phones being added to our family plan, I recently just revised it for 3 phones and was floored by how much Sprint’s Total Equipment Protection (TEP) plan costs currently: $13 per phone!

With 3 phones in my house, that’s an extra $39 per month – just for insurance!

This leaves me wondering:

Is cell phone insurance like Sprint’s TEP something I really need to have?  At the rate they are charging, does the cost of the coverage even justify the benefit?

Let’s take a closer look and see if it really makes sense.

 

What It Really Costs for Sprint’s TEP

For the sake of the following examples, let’s say I took Sprint’s advice and paid for this service every month. At a rate of $13 per month, that’s an extra $13 x 12 = $156 of expense per year per phone.

Because I have three phones to manage, that’s $156 x 3 = $468 per year for this service.

The Hidden Deductible

Now, you could argue that $156 per phone is much less than the cost of paying for a whole new iPhone altogether. Heck, those things pretty much cost $650 brand new.

But there would be one very important detail you’d be missing. Because we have the latest iPhone, even with the most expense TEP plan, there is also a $200 deductible to pay if most circumstances.

So really $156 per year is more like $156 + $200 = $356 if something did in fact go seriously wrong like your phone being lost or stolen.

Not the Same Phone

Again, $356 is still less than the cost of a new $650 iPhone. BUT, again, there’s one more detail we’re falsing assuming …

Suppose something tragic really did happen to one of our new iPhones. Will Sprint be giving us a brand-new, out of the box device to replace the one we paid for coverage on?

Unfortunately, NO! As it turns out, if you read the fine print, Sprint actually has the option to give you a “refurbished phone”.

That’s right – you’ll be getting a used phone that was more than likely repaired by Sprint after someone else might have busted it (not to mention who knows where it’s been).

 

Where the Costs Out-Weigh the Benefit

So to sum this all up, let’s put things into perspective: There’s the expensive cost of the TEP service, the high deductible on top of that, and the fact that you might get a lower quality, refurbished phone in place of your new one.

Now consider that you can buy a used cell phone online for less than $356. In fact, Sprint themselves was selling refurbished iPhone 5s’s for $300.

So literally it would be cheaper to simply buy the older model phone at $300 than to have TEP for one year and have to pay the deductible ($356).

Let’s make this even more interesting.  Fast forward to the end of two years. Now you’ve paid $156 x 2 = $312 for Sprint TEP plus a hypothetical $200 deductible if something had happened. That’s a total of $512. That’s just $138 shy of the cost of the latest and greatest NEW $650 iPhone.

When you multiply everything we just talked about times 3 phones, the analysis really starts to make no sense.

Let’s pretend at the end of the first year that something awful happened to all three of my phones. I would then have paid $156 x 3 = $468 for one year of TEP service and $200 x 3 = $600 in deductibles. That’s $1,068 altogether.

After two years, that’s $936 in TEP and $600 in deductibles for a total of $1,536. Again, I almost could have bought three of the latest iPhones at that rate.

 

Don’t Forget About Depreciation

We haven’t even mentioned the fact that after two years, your phone is basically worthless.  If you don’t think so, just ask your cell phone provider what the trade in value is.  You’ll get a good laugh.

For most people, two years marks the end of when they are done making payments on the device.  So what then is the benefit of equipment protection at that point?  You’d be throwing away money each month that you either could have saved or used to buy yourself a new device.

To continue your insurance coverage would be like having full-coverage auto insurance on your 1998 Saturn – it just wouldn’t make any sense.

 

Conclusions

After pouring through the numbers, I think you can see that under these conditions, I’m just not seeing how Sprint’s Total Equipment Protection service is worth the money. According to CNET, PC magazine, and Policy Genius, I may not be alone in my reasoning that this is some kind of a rip-off.

Even we give the cell phone carriers the benefit of the doubt and take a middle-of-the-road approach, let’s suppose one of the three phones develops a problem within the next two years. I could easily purchase a previous model phone for around $300 and resolve the issue until a time when it is appropriate to new our services. That would have saved me $936 in actual TEP costs and a potential $200 deductible; $1,136 in total savings.

I should mention that when we revised our plan, I actually tried to have the three lines of $13 TEP coverage removed. However, I was told by the Sprint representative that with revised service this was coverage was mandatory for the first month. So right out of the gate, we’re off to a bad start. I would imagine that, by default, Sprint probably does this because there is a very high likelihood that most people will simply “forget” about this expense, not bother to remove it, and just go on obviously paying the extra fees.

At a minimum if you really feel strongly about having some sort of insurance or equipment coverage on your device, then the only way I could see this making any sort of sense would be to have it for the first year only when your phone is at its maximum value. From the second year on, much like a car, the phone has lost over half of its value and is no longer worth the $356 in potential annual cost if you needed to have it replaced.

In fairness to Sprint, they do offer other versions of this coverage at a reduced rate (although as I understand it, your deductible increases for most of them).

Keep in mind, too, that you don’t necessarily have to always go with just your cell phone service provider for insurance or coverage. There are many affordable alternatives you could consider. Lifehacker has a pretty good list.

Just be sure to read the fine print on any insurance plan before you place an order. Some of them do not cover things that you would expect to be covered such as theft or water damage. What can I say … it’s insurance – there always seems to be a catch!

 

Featured image courtesy of Pexels

Filed Under: Savings & Budgeting Tagged With: Sprint, TEP, Total Equipment Protection

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. CarriePink says

    June 22, 2016 at 10:25 am

    Husband and I recently did the exact same analysis and took the sprint tep off! It is a total wasteof money, unless you leased/financed your phones in which case even if they get destroyed you would still have to finish paying for them. I didn’t even know you could finance a phone in that way, which is the only good reason to insure it..

    Reply
    • MMD says

      July 2, 2016 at 7:28 pm

      It’s all such a scam! I sorta liked the original arrangement better where you got a free phone when you signed up for whatever plan they were offering at the time.

      Reply
      • DC says

        January 17, 2018 at 4:47 pm

        That old version was worse b/c the amount they charged you monthly included you paying for the phone but that additional cost never went away. They covered it up with that extra $30 “data plan” cost. Now you pay for the phone and the extra cost goes away after 24 months.

        Reply
    • Sachin A Kalanke says

      April 10, 2019 at 10:14 pm

      True,

      I just tried to cancel my 2 old phones which were still paying for the insurances. The Representative was not letting me do it and scaring me about getting unprotected and losing all the data immediately if something has to happen. After asking her how to access my data she transferred to technical dept who never picked up the phone.

      It a total Scam.

      Reply
  2. Jayson @ Monster Piggy Bank says

    June 24, 2016 at 8:14 pm

    Thanks for sharing your experience, MMD. It’s really worth it to check first the coverage of an insurance before we place an order to see if it covers the needs we may have later on.

    Reply
    • MMD says

      July 2, 2016 at 7:30 pm

      It certainly does! This was certainly a special case where the ends don’t justify the means.

      Reply
  3. ARB says

    June 28, 2016 at 7:09 pm

    I don’t have Sprint, but my iPhone 5C has had a cracked screen for about a year. I have no idea if I have insurance on it, but I’m sure that’s more expensive than the $100 it costs to fix the screen, especially factoring in that deductible.

    And so my screen is just going to stay perpetually broken.

    Sincerely,
    ARB–Angry Retail Banker

    Reply
    • MMD says

      July 2, 2016 at 7:31 pm

      I forget where I heard it, but I thought there was a story of someone working on shatter-proof material for your phone. How revolutionary would that be?

      Reply
  4. Christopher Hay says

    August 1, 2016 at 4:12 pm

    It is a waste of money, especially how they give you refurbished phones if anything was to happen to your new phone. A few months ago my phone fell causing the screen to shatter, when I used my insurance from sprint they gave me a crappy refurbished s4 that kept freezing. They told me the cause for the freezing was probably the charger and when I ask to get a suited charger they said the charger was not covered under the warranty.

    Reply
  5. Robert L. Hernandez says

    November 13, 2016 at 8:35 pm

    It’s a total rip off, I just had it removed from my plan .. I hate all this BS the wireless providers are doing to the consumer, it’s ridiculous and very exhausting to deal with just about any issue related to your cell phone these days. I’m amazed at this monopoly and just plain customer service and rip off after all these years and nothing is going to change anytime soon.

    Great opportunity for a startup but that would require a core network to execute.

    Reply
    • MMD says

      November 14, 2016 at 7:12 pm

      Agreed! It’s all just a complicated game to separate you from your money.

      Reply
  6. Daniel Livengood says

    October 12, 2017 at 2:34 pm

    I’ve been paying $13 per month. For ever and never filed a claim. My leased Note 5 has water damage. They want $200 deductible for a phone worth $160 and that’s total protection plus WOW.

    Reply
  7. Rimm says

    October 25, 2018 at 2:42 pm

    I’ve paid $13 for an year on iPhone 6S and when the screen shattered, they say the damage is so much that I have to file a claim which has a $200 deductible. Total rip off.

    Reply
  8. D. R. Peck says

    April 19, 2020 at 8:47 pm

    Great information that I came about while locked out of my Sprint account and suffering from a stolen iPhone. and iPad Pro Initially, I was looking for just bare bones information on the cost of my deductibles this time, and stumbled onto this article. In my case, I started with an iPhone 6 and a first generation iPad Pro and all three have been stolen now three times, which has cost me a lot, and have been fortunate that with the phones I have never been provided refurbished and have been given an updated model, and the iPads have always been the latest model available.

    Thieves and false claims are sadly driving these high monthly fees and not just profit. In my latest case, I had my phone, pad, and wallet taken as I was checking into a San Francisco hospital with a life threatening emergency. I passed out on the other side of the glass and with lax security (piss poor) I was robbed before ER staff got to me. I spent 60 days there, and another 30 days in a specialized rehab/nursing facility, and now I am home thankfully under home healthcare.

    Thanks again for a great article.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

More Great Posts!

Footer

Recent Posts

  • How to Manage Your Debt and Reduce Financial Stress
  • How to Invest During a Recession and Actually Make More Money
  • What’s the Best Way to Retire Early? By Doing This One Important Thing
  • How to Stop Worrying About Money – 5 Effective Strategies for Better Money Habits
  • How to Turn Cloudy Pool Water From Green to Blue

Search

Archives

My Money Design is for entertainment and reference purposes only. The information presented is the opinion of the author only and should not be interpreted as specific advice or recommendations towards your financial situation. Always consult with a true professional before making any financial decisions.

Affiliate Disclaimer: My Money Design may be compensated for our personal opinions, reviews, and affiliate relationships with some of the featured products and services. Google Adsense and Amazon Associates are examples of such relationships. Such content, advertising space or posts may not always be identified as paid or sponsored content. All offers or claims are subject to change without notice and should be verified with the manufacturer, provider or party in question.

Copyright © 2011–2023 MyMoneyDesign.com · All Rights Reserved · Powered by WordPress

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.